jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Boston <...@tfd.co.uk>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit 1.2.3, RecordInput/DatabaseJournal
Date Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:27:02 GMT
Cool thanks,

I've noticed that if I use the same package name, then I can do what I 
want... not exactly good practice, but since when I re-implement, 99% of 
the code is almost your code, its not quite so bad and it makes more 
sense with your license header and all.

One quick question, which parts of the repository filesystem {rep.home} 
should be in shared space and local space on the cluster node, I'm using 
content on filesystem.


Dominique Pfister wrote:
> Hi Ian,
> On 4/27/07, Ian Boston <ieb@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
>> I want to extend reimplemente DatabaseJounal (core.cluster), but there
>> is a dependency on RecordInput which is a protected class (or at least
>> default scope).
>> So you cant extend AbstractDatabaseJournal except in the same package
>> (perhaps thats the answer)
>> Is there a reason for this, or was it an oversight.
> This is definitely an oversight. Ideally, DatabaseJournal should have
> a protected method named "getConnection", that may be overridden to
> change the way a connection is acquired. I will file a bug for this.
>> The reason I want to extend as I am embedding Jackrabbit into Sakai
>> (www.sakaiproject.org) and I would prefer to use a DataSource rather
>> DriverManager delivered connection .... even if I get the connection and
>> keep it.
> For the time being, if using a DataSource is an absolute must, there
> is nothing else I can suggest than checking out the source code from
> svn, applying the required changes directly to your local copy and
> building a new, customized version.
> Kind regards
> Dominique

View raw message