jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-851) Handling of binary properties (streams) in QValue interface
Date Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:39:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489942
] 

Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-851:
-----------------------------------

> > The most usual (only?) reason for a client to create QValues is when the client
wants to
> > store content in the repository
>
> is probably not totally correct, isn't it? i was told recently that almost everything
was reading :) 

Note the part "for a client". The SPI implementation obviously creates QValues whenever content
is read, but I don't believe that is a problem in this case.

> Handling of binary properties (streams) in QValue interface
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-851
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-851
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>
> The current SPI requires QValue to return new streams upon each call to getStream().
As far as I can tell, this essentially requires a QValue implementation to preserve the whole
content of a stream, be it in memory or on disk.
> In particular (and unless I'm missing something), when importing large content into a
repository, this causes the whole data stream to be written twice. We really should try to
avoid that.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message