jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-851) Handling of binary properties (streams) in QValue interface
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:24:15 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489872

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-851:

In which case we should change the contract, right? Right now, making the 99% use case work
both correctly and efficiently is just harder than it needs to be...

> Handling of binary properties (streams) in QValue interface
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-851
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-851
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
> The current SPI requires QValue to return new streams upon each call to getStream().
As far as I can tell, this essentially requires a QValue implementation to preserve the whole
content of a stream, be it in memory or on disk.
> In particular (and unless I'm missing something), when importing large content into a
repository, this causes the whole data stream to be written twice. We really should try to
avoid that.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message