Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81222 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2007 22:00:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Mar 2007 22:00:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 98054 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2007 22:01:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 97681 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2007 22:01:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 97672 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2007 22:01:00 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:01:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:00:52 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998B2714066 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7474528.1174946432625.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:00:32 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (JCR-788) Upgrade to Lucene 2.1 In-Reply-To: <16107341.1173777489220.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12484243 ] Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-788: ----------------------------------- Please do share a patch with your changes. It's always easier to judge a change if the actual code is available. BTW, would the modified class still work with Lucene 2.0? I also assume that Lucene 2.1 is compatible with indexes created with 2.0. I agree that we should try to keep up with Lucene upgrades, but on the other hand I would not want to force too frequent dependency changes on users. If the change works with Lucene 2.0, then existing users wouldn't need to upgrade their dependencies. If not, then the upgrade procedure needs to be documented in the release notes. If there is no immediate demand for the upgrade, I would rather wait until Jackrabbit 1.3 is branched before doing this. > Upgrade to Lucene 2.1 > --------------------- > > Key: JCR-788 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-788 > Project: Jackrabbit > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query > Reporter: Marcel Reutegger > Priority: Minor > > Lucene 2.1 contains a number of useful enhancements, which could be benefical to jackrabbit: > - less locking on index updates -> less IO calls > - introduces FieldSelector -> allows jackrabbit to only load required fields -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.