jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-801) Support for single-workspace repositories
Date Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:18:32 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12483228

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-801:

More thoughts on this:

- leaving javax.jcr.tck.workspacename undefined may be too obscure, as an empty string may
be a valid workspace name (and in fact it is in my impl, being the name of the (single) default

- another alternative would be to set it to the name of a known-not-to-exist workspace and
just to catch NoSuchWorkspaceExceptions, mapping them to NotExecutableExceptions -- the drawback
here that it may obscure typos in the config.

Thus my new proposal is to compute once for all whether the repository supports multiple workspaces
(get available workspace names on superuser session, and check the array size to be > 1),
and then throw NotExecutableExceptions whenever a different workspace is needed.

If there are no objections, I'll add this tomorrow.

> Support for single-workspace repositories
> -----------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-801
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-801
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JCR TCK
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
> There should be a way to configure the test cases in a way such that NodeTest.java can
pass although the repository implementation does not support multiple workspaces.
> The cleanest approach probably would be to allow javax.jcr.tck.workspacename to stay
undefined, and to skip the tests in that case. Alternatives would be a special name indicating
lack of support for other workspaces, or an additional config variable.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message