jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-741) Handling of multiple residual prop defs in EffectiveNodeTypeImpl
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:09:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477963

Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-741:

> Not convinced. If the node type allows multiple property definitions here, obtaining
the right one from the
> store doesn't seem to be any harder than selecting one of the ones supplied by the caller.

my point is to possibly avoid a call (by an spi implementation) to the store and give an spi
implementation the opportunity to implement the method as an entirely local call. Would this
work in your case, or would you still have to ask the store to pick the right definition?

> Anyway; if we do that, do we still need RepositoryService.getPropertyDefinition? Right
now it's not used
> by JCR2SPI which makes me a bit nervous :-).

IMO we should remove the method RepositoryService.getPropertyDefinition() anyway. It does
not scale well and in almost all cases it can be infered from the node type definition which
property definition applies to a certain property. I think the same also applies to child
node definitions (jcr2spi only uses the method to get the node definition for the root node).

Using the node type definition and its item definitions require much lesser calls to the SPI
than using getPropertyDefinition() and getNodeDefinition(). So, I think jcr2spi does it the
right way, even though it doesn't use getPropertyDefinition().

> Handling of multiple residual prop defs in EffectiveNodeTypeImpl
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-741
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-741
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>         Assigned To: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
> org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.nodetype.EffectiveNodeTypeImpl currently rejects multiple
residual property definitions, if they do not differ in getMultiple(). In fact, it should
accept all combinations, so differing values for getOnParentVersionAction and other aspects
should be accepted as well.
> See JSR 170, 6.7.8:
> "For purposes of the above, the notion of two definitions having the same name does not
apply to two residual definitions. Two (or more) residual property or child node definitions
with differing subattributes must be permitted to co-exist in the same effective node type.
They are interpreted as disjunctive (ORed) options."

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message