jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martijn Hendriks (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-716) Performance: caching negative results
Date Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:57:10 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481516

Martijn Hendriks commented on JCR-716:

The recently added bundle persistence managers cache non-existing NodeIds. So I guess that
this resolves this issue?

> Performance: caching negative results
> -------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-716
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-716
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Martijn Hendriks
>         Attachments: SharedItemStateManager.java
> We recently have been looking at the performance of JackRabbit and noted that the SharedItemStateManager
does not cache negative results. For instance, when "hasItemState" returns false, then this
negative result is not cached and a subsequent call with the same ItemId will again query
the database (if the item has not been added and cached yet). We think, however, that caching
such negative results might improve the performance significantly for some applications.
> I've tried to add a simple negative-caching scheme. ItemIds are negatively cached in
the method "hasNonVirtualItemState" when the persistence manager returns "false". Cache eviction
occurs in the method "getNonVirtualItemState" when a state is loaded. It also seems necessary
to evict ItemIds in the methods "stateCreated" and "has/getItemState" (when one of the virtual
providers returns something), because when an ItemId is neg-cached, it might still be provided
by one of the VISP. The negative cache can then be used in the method "hasNonVirtualItemState"
like this:
> if (cache.isCached(id)) {
>      return true;
> } else if (negativeCache.isCached(id)) {
>      return false;
> }
> Although all JackRabbit tests succeeded during compilation and our application seemingly
behaved ok, I still doubt that my implementation is completely correct (I don't know the ins
and outs of the SharedItemStateManager and made some assumptions). We are, however, quite
eager to investigate this further as our application is 15% faster in an important use case
with this very simple negative caching scheme enabled.
> Is there any previous work on something like this in JackRabbit? How difficult is a solid
> Regards,
> Martijn Hendriks

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message