Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <510143ac0702200718j49e0f00te7c94efdecb18e34@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8be731880702200632k43b2497dn76474125112607dc@mail.gmail.com>
 <510143ac0702200718j49e0f00te7c94efdecb18e34@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <9F92FE8D-4364-4AF9-818C-59F7B9F2DE54@gbiv.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Subject: Re: Bundle Persistence Manager
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:46:54 -0800
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org

On Feb 20, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> 3. Day files a software grant
> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt) for the
> contributed code.

It is sufficient for Day to send an addendum to the existing grant.

In other words, ask David to send email to Jim Jagielski (and cc the
jackrabbit dev list) that says the additional code also falls under
our existing grant agreement.  While he is doing that, he should also
add the names of our new employees to the Day CCLA.

> PS. We should have done this already when the SPI codebase was
> introduced. The ASF board noted about this, but the issue was not
> critical enough to require after-the-fact actions. In any case we
> should do things by the book this time.

I thought we did.  David Nuescheler sent his message to this list
saying that it was a contribution under the existing CCLA, and that
is sufficient for Apache legal.  David is the official contact.

....Roy