jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-741) Handling of multiple residual prop defs in EffectiveNodeTypeImpl
Date Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:18:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476122
] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-741:
------------------------------------

That would work, but why would the SPI implementation would ever need the definitions parameter?
For an existing property, an SPI implementation should always precisely know the QPropDef
right?

Or is this about requesting the definition of a property *before* it is being created? That
would be useful, but again I don't see what the definitions parameters would do here?



> Handling of multiple residual prop defs in EffectiveNodeTypeImpl
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-741
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-741
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>         Assigned To: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.nodetype.EffectiveNodeTypeImpl currently rejects multiple
residual property definitions, if they do not differ in getMultiple(). In fact, it should
accept all combinations, so differing values for getOnParentVersionAction and other aspects
should be accepted as well.
> See JSR 170, 6.7.8:
> "For purposes of the above, the notion of two definitions having the same name does not
apply to two residual definitions. Two (or more) residual property or child node definitions
with differing subattributes must be permitted to co-exist in the same effective node type.
They are interpreted as disjunctive (ORed) options."

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message