jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-647) NodeType.canRemoveItem does not consider residual definitions (JCR2SPI)
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:43:22 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-647?page=comments#action_12454968 ] 
            
Julian Reschke commented on JCR-647:
------------------------------------

For the record:

- I agree with Angela's analysis, and

- I was wrong when I thought I say other related problems when the other checker methods;
all of these were caused by my SPI implementation.


> NodeType.canRemoveItem does not consider residual definitions (JCR2SPI)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-647
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-647
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: JCR-647.diff.txt
>
>
> JCR2SPI's NodeType.canRemoveItem() doesn't seem to work with residual definitions. This
seems to be caused by EffectiveNodeTyoeImpl.checkRemoveItemConstraints not checking the unnamed
definitions.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message