jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-647) NodeType.canRemoveItem does not consider residual definitions (JCR2SPI)
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:43:22 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-647?page=comments#action_12454968 ] 
Julian Reschke commented on JCR-647:

For the record:

- I agree with Angela's analysis, and

- I was wrong when I thought I say other related problems when the other checker methods;
all of these were caused by my SPI implementation.

> NodeType.canRemoveItem does not consider residual definitions (JCR2SPI)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-647
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-647
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SPI
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: JCR-647.diff.txt
> JCR2SPI's NodeType.canRemoveItem() doesn't seem to work with residual definitions. This
seems to be caused by EffectiveNodeTyoeImpl.checkRemoveItemConstraints not checking the unnamed

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message