Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98124 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2006 11:48:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2006 11:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 54521 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2006 11:48:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 54318 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2006 11:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 54309 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2006 11:48:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.232 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.232] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:48:25 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so2278208wxd for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:45:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=K0drwmT66zu49AutXZjaaz1SO8ADF1UrEl6pLnAx50SXRH488HOgSUqErM10iyxv23hWOh/9M3TUqBPeiXxVtk0NuBw2rKnNOeWEZiOegL0DT78Izi7xxMwD6X6u8wFDFnmam+ymBOLukDNG2YtY3c06F7QbwxjudLC94qDotgg= Received: by 10.90.68.15 with SMTP id q15mr1935664aga.1164800739979; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:45:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.27.7 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:45:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510143ac0611290345k4db86a3fn9cfd923e5cdf867e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:45:39 +0200 From: "Jukka Zitting" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Jira guidelines MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, In order to make our issue tracker better support the release process I had to again tweak some issues as you've probably noticed by the number of recent Jira notifications. To make things easier I'd like to propose the following general guidelines for working with Jira issues: * Issue Type Generally only "Bug" issues are considered for inclusion in patch releases. * Affects Version(s) Use this when entering "Bug" reports. Select all the release numbers where you believe the reported issue to occur. If you don't know or if the issue was introduced just recently in trunk, just leave the field empty. Leave this field empty also when entering feature or improvement requests. Selecting also old release numbers makes it easier for people that are running older versions to quickly determine whether a reported bug affects their installation or not. * Fix Version(s) This field is essential for the release process. Generally you should fill it when resolving an issue; use the release numer of the release that's next planned from trunk (normally the next minor x.y release). If the issue is a bug report and you think the fix is safe enough to be included in a patch release (i.e. it shouldn't introduce any regressions), you can also select the next planned patch release number (x.y.z). You can also enter a target release number here already before the issue is fixed if you consider that the issue is essential for the release. This allows us to better track the progress towards a release. * Resolution Always use the resolution "Fixed" when resolving an issue that you've solved. All other resolutions will invalidate the issue so that it won't be included in any change histories or known issue lists. * Closing an issue Issues should be closed (as opposed to resolving them) only when they've been included in an official release. Thus only the release manager should ever need to close issues. Note that a closed issue should never be reopened since it's considered a part of an existing release. File a new issue that links back to the closed one if you find that the resolution in fact doesn't work. BR, Jukka Zitting