Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.239 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=BXP2OHyb1DNatljBoeSv9vx0UPp4foETD21APmr35vNtmqswIzfvx3Ih4FuSRYQ4N2daduUXigDvheXWaVR0HcZuvJfUa8p7PIeWnpuNyXd2kovpisFveqQIKGy3RM5RWdEbADkTtscSa9TPYG2yGUzaTU1M+xjiOgt7lAMMC8s=
Message-ID: <510143ac0611240625r4123863bj14d4021ae765deb0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:25:46 +0200
From: "Jukka Zitting" <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: JackRabbit performance tests report
In-Reply-To: <c3585d240611240600v5b6ddf53g38ddd6527d60da43@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <004401c70fca$5f2af650$a007840a@pcmnowak>
	 <90a8d1c00611240542r355e4e90n5a0d53b92a737fb9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c3585d240611240547w7f651869y5b0721dba626849b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c3585d240611240600v5b6ddf53g38ddd6527d60da43@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 11/24/06, Stefan Gruszczynski <stefan.gruszczynski@gmail.com> wrote:
> So if not RMI than what? Did you or anybody else performed any performance
> tests not based on RMI?

I think the most frequently used deployment models for Jackrabbit are
models 1 and 2 where the repository is running within the same JVM as
the client application.

There have been some performance tests but so far we've seen very
little raw data or consistent reports being sent back to the
community. Having your results available is very valuable!

> I think that some of those tests are not affected by RMI disadvantages /i.e.
> deleting nodes or pasring XML documents/ because those operations are
> running on server side only - without or with small communication with client
> - what about cpu load and memory usage - does RMI affect it in any way?

You're correct, see my other mail for the most likely bottlenecks. The
RMI layer does very little work by itself so it should have a
negligible effect on CPU loads and shouldn't introduce too much memory
overhead.

BR,

Jukka Zitting