jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Topi Westerholm (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-352) Upgrade to Lucene 2.0
Date Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:17:42 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-352?page=comments#action_12450661 ] 
            
Topi Westerholm commented on JCR-352:
-------------------------------------

Is there an error in the patch file? It seems that following the correction logic the next
segment (NodeIndexer.java) should have a "Field.Store.NO" at the first parameter.

true=Field.Store.YES ?
false=Field.Store.NO ?


     /**
@@ -416,9 +416,9 @@
         }
         doc.add(new Field(FieldNames.PROPERTIES,
                 FieldNames.createNamedValue(fieldName, pathString),
-                false,
-                true,
-                false));
+                Field.Store.YES,
+                Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED,
+                Field.TermVector.NO));
     }


> Upgrade to Lucene 2.0
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-352
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-352
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: indexing
>    Affects Versions: 1.0, 0.9, 1.0.1
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Michael Young
>         Assigned To: Jukka Zitting
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>         Attachments: lucene2-pom.xml.patch, lucene2-project.xml.patch, lucene2.patch
>
>
> We would like to upgrade to Lucene 1.9.1. There are jar conflicts when integrating with
other projects such as Liferay Portal --  which uses v 1.9.1.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message