Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-9096-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5618 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2006 09:34:37 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2006 09:34:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 96469 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2006 09:34:35 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96420 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2006 09:34:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.jackrabbit.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96411 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2006 09:34:35 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:34:35 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of gcaj-jackrabbit-dev@m.gmane.org
 designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender)
Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:34:34 -0700
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GXwwq-0007bR-E0
	for dev@jackrabbit.apache.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:33:53 +0200
Received: from 203.199.144.64 ([203.199.144.64])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:33:52 +0200
Received: from eknathkadam by 203.199.144.64 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:33:52 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
From: Eknath Kadam <eknathkadam@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Commented: (JCR-352) Upgrade to Lucene 2.0
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:33:26 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <loom.20061012T112824-294@post.gmane.org>
References: <22450386.1160624978607.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 203.199.144.64 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060726 Red Hat/1.5.0.5-0.el4.1 Firefox/1.5.0.5
 pango-text)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Chen Shaopeng (JIRA <jira <at> apache.org> writes:

> When will Jackrabbit upgrade to Lucene 2.0? I just looked at the JCR 1.1
source code in Subversion, and it is
> still dependent on Lucene 1.4.3, invoking deprecated methods that have been
removed from Lucene 2.0.
> 
> Thanks a lot.

I am one of those who is waiting deperately for jackrabbit moving
 to Lucene 1.9x or 2.0
We use flat class loader for our jboss for some reason. 
My app uses Lucene 1.9.1 and jackrabbit repository uses 
1.4.3, and hence both can not exist in same server.

Thanks,
EKnath