jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcel Reutegger <marcel.reuteg...@gmx.net>
Subject Re: Jackrabbits own FileSystem and unit tests
Date Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:40:11 GMT
sorry for the late response but I was on paternity leave...

Christoph Kiehl wrote:
> But isn't it necessary for the index data to be committed to the 
> database/pm to get a transactional index? I mean if you commit the index 
> changes from the redo.log in a new transaction you don't really gain 
> anything compared to the current solution regarding transactional index 
> behavior, do you?

I expect there will be a performance gain. rather than committing the 
inverted index, which possibly requires segment optimizations in 
lucene, simply appending to a log is much faster.


View raw message