jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexandru Popescu" <the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: One more comment
Date Fri, 01 Sep 2006 21:04:52 GMT
On 9/1/06, Dan Connelly <dsconnelly@adelphia.net> wrote:
> The more I work with Graffito ocm the more I like it.   The code is
> first-rate and deserves to leave incubation.

Damn... I have waited for a long time to hear this :-). Thanks.

> However, the ocm code has very few dependencies on Jackrabbit.   Why is
> it then to be a Jackrabbit sub-project?

I guess what is more important is that it is JCR API based. So,
Jackrabbit will offer an JCR implementation and tools to develop. Nice
combination, imo.

.w( the_mindstorm )p.

> One can connect this ocm tool to a non-JR Content Repository with very
> little  effort.
> For that reason, I do not see Graffito ocm as a sub-project of
> Jackrabbit (assuming "Jackrabbit" is the name of the repository
> implementation).
> At the risk of being pedantic, let me suggest to you the idea of an
> Apache Content Repository Project, with Jackrabbit, OCM and CDNUtils
> being co-equal sub-projects (in parallel with the Apache (R)DB Project
> having Derby, JDO and DdUtils as its co-equal sub-projects).
>     -- Dan

View raw message