From dev-return-8391-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Wed Aug 09 20:16:37 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7471 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2006 20:16:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2006 20:16:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 34835 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2006 20:16:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 34813 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2006 20:16:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 34804 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2006 20:16:35 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:16:35 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.6.122.19] (HELO mail3.ewetel.de) (212.6.122.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:16:34 -0700 Received: from jedi (dyndsl-085-016-033-186.ewe-ip-backbone.de [85.16.33.186]) by mail3.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k79KFwYq019167; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:16:05 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jedi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B33478560; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:46:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jedi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jedi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27697-03; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:46:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:16:20 +0200 From: Lars Heuer X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1445248272.20060809221620@semagia.com> To: "robert burrell donkin" Cc: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org, Jerome Louvel Subject: Re: using jackrabbit to store email with meta-data In-Reply-To: References: <510143ac0607121442s3be3ca47of35ace476b7afeb1@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0607140724q1bb02bffjf6de4f3b3a033e2a@mail.gmail.com> <509286299.20060803162919@semagia.com> <796719443.20060804153213@semagia.com> <1714244517.20060807122332@semagia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS X-CheckCompat: OK X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Robert, [...] > one of the main reasons why i want to use webDAV is that it's RESTful. > IMAP and POP3 both suck for the problems i'm interested in because > they are not. Yes. But I just want to create a RESTful 'view' at IMAP / POP3. Nothing to edit / change, only view. :) I think that is possible with the 'legacy' protocols. :) > IMHO email is basically authoring and so is a good match for webDAV. > i'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the way you planned to map > common email operations to RESTful operations. Well, the RESTful email system is a long term project and I don't have investigated much time to think about RESTful operations. Maybe Jérôme (the deveoloper of Restlet) has investigated more thought on it. The complete RESTful e-mail system is just an idea. I want my RESTful views first. :) [...] >> XML For Digital Preservation: XML Implementation Options for E-Mails >> > what are the advantages of using xml? I think it might be easier to transform XML into another format than the plain e-mail text. What do you want to achive with your project? Leave IMAP/POP3 completely out? Best regards, Lars -- http://www.semagia.com