jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nicolas " <nto...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Adding a method to PropInfos
Date Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:42:47 GMT
Hi

I am working on a backup and restore tool for Jackrabbit. It's why I need to
escape all checks since I am writing protected node (for this reason).

What is your other idea about this please?


BR
Nicolas
my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !!

On 8/15/06, Stefan Guggisberg <stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/14/06, Nicolas <ntoper@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In order to restore properly the content of a workspace, I needed to
> escape
> > some checks the regular WorkspaceImporter class was doing. I rewrote a
> > custom Importer with no problem. ( It's basically a copy/paste of the
> > current importer without the check: it's a short term solution for now
> but a
> > working one. We plan to implement a switch to escape all checks in JR
> > internal.)
> >
> > However, I couldn't do the same with the PropInfo class. Therefore I add
> to
> > add a restoreApply method, which is the same as apply but without the
> check.
> > Maybe I should rename it? I choose restoreApply to emphathise the fact
> that
> > it's reserved for the restore operation.
>
> without knowing exactly what you're up to, i doubt that this would be a
> good
> approach. it rather looks like a nasty hack...
>
> cheers
> stefan
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message