Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7350 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2006 18:25:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2006 18:25:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3004 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2006 18:25:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 2971 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2006 18:25:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 2962 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2006 18:25:55 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:25:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of piccinatto@ibest.com.br designates 200.181.68.97 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.181.68.97] (HELO angmar.ibest.com.br) (200.181.68.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:25:52 -0700 Received: from ibest.com.br (ibvipnew.ibest.com.br [127.0.0.1]) by angmar.ibest.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF7427BA1 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 18:25:24 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 2.117 (F2.6; A1.50; B2.12; Q2.03) X-Mailer: IbestMail X-Organization: Ibest S/A X-Identity: 931768_1144175124 From: "hsp" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Indexes for contents outside the repository. Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:25:24 -0300 Message-Id: <20060404182524.BBF7427BA1@angmar.ibest.com.br> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Let me share my dilema with you. We have an CVS repository, where we put the project files and documentation in. I have to make a repository that will have the contents the applications will need, but for reason to do not duplicate the files already in CVS and that have got to be available in the repository (visible by the application like the files were in the repository, but they are in CVS). If the problem was only this, ok, only just creating a propertie with the link to file in CVS will at first solve it. But these files that is visible by application repository and in fact are in CVS, must be fulltext searcheable.... Any thoughts for this case? Can I do a index for these files, as like they were in repository, and by a query in jackrabbit I would find the files that has the content I am looking for? If the case was not clear for you I can rebuild it. I am not soo good for explain, you know... Thanks Helio.