jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Kick <gk5...@kickstyle.net>
Subject residual definition xml implementation
Date Sat, 15 Apr 2006 03:41:50 GMT

i have a quick question about node type definitions.  jackrabbit  
consistently (NodeTypeWriter, custom_nodetypes.xml, etc.) uses  
name="*" for residual definitions in the xml format.  however, p. 144  
of the jsr170 spec says that * is not a valid name and the attribute  
should be dropped for residual definitions.  so the question is  
whether it was used on purpose in jackrabbit or if this is a  
mistake.  i haven't looked at the code much, but it seems like it  
would actually be harder to implement with the * than without...   
anyway, a little insight would be appreciated because googleing the  
archives gave me nothing.


greg kick

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message