jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "jeremi joslin" <jerem...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Suggestion for PROPPATCH with simple-server (was: Status of jcr-server)
Date Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:29:03 GMT
On 4/6/06, Angela Schreiber <anchela@day.com> wrote:
[snip]
>
>
> Proposed solution
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> The situation described before leads me to the
> following conclusion:
>
> - IOHandler should not only read/write resource data
>    and properties during GET, PUT, PROPFIND but should
>    also take care of setting/removing properties without
>    modifying the data during PROPPATCH.
>
> - Since the previous suggestion would still limit
>    the properties to (jcr:encoding, jcr:mimeType and
>    jcr:lastModified), we may think about changing the
>    default nodetype for the jcr:content node to
>    nt:unstructured.
>
> I guess this would meet the requirements for those
> expecting a webDAV server that is (as a first step)
> not limited regarding PROPPATCH. Second it would
> allow to have a handling of property modifications
> which is specific for individual resource types instead
> of trying to set all properties to the uppermost node.
>
> what do you think?

Hi

I don't know enought the jcr, so i can't tell you if the node chose is
the best, but I trust you for making the right choice.

For allowing the propatch to modify the properties, I agree.

so +1

Jérémi

--
Blog: http://www.jeremi.info
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724
Project Manager XWiki: http://www.xwiki.org
skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : jeremi23@gmail.com
Mime
View raw message