Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71390 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2006 09:49:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2006 09:49:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 67358 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2006 09:49:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 67320 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2006 09:49:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 67310 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2006 09:49:41 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:49:41 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:49:40 -0800 Received: from ajax (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C573D4A00 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:49:19 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <51893297.1143107359637.JavaMail.jira@ajax> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:49:19 +0000 (GMT) From: "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (JCR-257) Use separate index for jcr:system tree MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-257?page=comments#action_12371536 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-257: -------------------------------------- Committed a preliminary fix. Most of the changes are actually located in the event system and not the search index itself. It would have probably made more sense to reopen JCR-141, but anyway... I strongly encourage everyone to re-index an existing repository that was used with a jackrabbit svn revision between 368026 and 388123 and that is now upgraded to a higher version! Indexing of versions was completely broken between those svn revision! I'm currently writing some additional test cases and will resolve this issue once I have commited the test cases. > Use separate index for jcr:system tree > -------------------------------------- > > Key: JCR-257 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-257 > Project: Jackrabbit > Type: Improvement > Versions: 1.0, 0.9 > Reporter: Marcel Reutegger > Assignee: Marcel Reutegger > Priority: Minor > > Currently each workspace index also includes index data of repository wide data (e.g. version nodes under jcr:system). There are several drawbacks with this approach: > - indexing is duplicated and does not scale when using a lot of workspaces > - workspaces cannot be 'put to sleep' when they are not actively used. > The repository should have an additional index for system data, which includes: versioning and nodetype representation in content. Basically data under /jcr:system. > Queries issued on a workspace will then use two index to execute the query: the workspace index and the system index. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira