Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84370 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2006 13:41:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2006 13:41:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 31108 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2006 13:41:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31092 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2006 13:41:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 05:41:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WEIRD_QUOTING X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of peeter.piegaze@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.206] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 05:41:14 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so823085nzb for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 05:40:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k3TH+ribprWyMJY6g637o0I9CgPIDmP00C3fzUrFKDIPvJc++PCULbxLrxeD6zdC9LotC/YUJiFSt+NWuivvqK0hNPcp2UlHnnAgTUprjhDyR3VN0lQ4+WTiVJmYtst3B5BXRdJtsL4GFHZDHT7CJmTcbtDWxs29JsIYNi181oA= Received: by 10.65.163.16 with SMTP id q16mr1170124qbo; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 05:40:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.197.5 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 05:40:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3df33a250602030540r6bee110ds58610a0da2f5e17a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:40:52 +0100 From: Peeter Piegaze Sender: peeter.piegaze@gmail.com To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: DP Persistence manager implementation In-Reply-To: <005101c628bc$dbf86690$340410ac@CHAND> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <005101c628bc$dbf86690$340410ac@CHAND> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 2/3/06, Chandresh Turakhia wrote: > I do agree. Partly because JSR 170 is marketed as 'JDBC for Content' :) > > Perception of Jackrabbit is something that stores ""smartly"" & reliabily > content in database > Supports ''Content-oriented interface'' like EMB ( Enterprise Media Bean > JSR 086). JBoss does support EMB. > > Simple Business Executive / Sponsor Brief for Content Projects : > "Architecturally Content Applications like CMS uses 'EMB' to save > content to 'ContentBase' using JCBC ( Java ContentBase Connectivity) i.e. > JCR" > " May use industry MPEG 21 framework for content interobility with our > partners" > > Oracle Semantic Web, XML DB and Intermedia are great stuff but propriety = tag > lingers and tough to get into mainstream applications :( > > Q1) People would appreciate DBPersistenance subclass for Oracle which use= s > the db features to the best. Has someone done similiar work ? > > Q2) Also DBA does not appreciate the whole idea of all the content going = in > just 1 big gigantic table. :(( How to get Content database refactored ? > > Q3) Has someone try to model MPEG 21 Content Model on top of JackRabbit / > 170 model. BRICK ( www.brickcommunity.org ) does something like that. All= of > sudden JCR 170 become mainstream media technology :) > > Chand huh?