jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aleksandar Pecanov <peca...@mt.net.mk>
Subject Re: SimpleDB Persistance for versioning
Date Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:12:17 GMT
Ok, thank you very much

On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 10:14 +0100, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:

> On 11/25/05, Aleksandar Pecanov <pecanov@mt.net.mk> wrote:
> > I just though because of it's configuration, that might cause a problem.
> > Does the simple db persistance manager store data in different tables
> > for every context?
> 
> depending on your configuration, yes.
> 
> take a look at the SimpleDbPersistenceManager java doc:
> 
> <quote>
> ...
>  It is configured through the following properties:
> ...
> schemaObjectPrefix: prefix to be prepended to schema objects
> ...
> </quote>
> 
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 09:46 +0100, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/24/05, Aleksandar Pecanov <pecanov@mt.net.mk> wrote:
> > > > Is it safe to use the same persistance manager (SimpleDB) for both
> > > > workspace and versioning?
> > >
> > > why shouldn't it be?
> > >
> > > > Is this already a standard procedure somewhere (what I mean is , is it
> > > > tested somewhere) ?
> > >
> > > the 'standard' configuration (see repository.xml in src/main/config and
> > > application/test) uses DerbyPersistenceManager for both workspaces
> > > and versioning.
> > >
> > > cheers
> > > stefan
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message