From jackrabbit-dev-return-4050-apmail-incubator-jackrabbit-dev-archive=www.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Sat Oct 15 15:52:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26151 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2005 15:52:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2005 15:52:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 26955 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2005 15:52:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26944 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2005 15:52:36 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:52:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 193.19.192.5 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of the.mindstorm.mailinglist@gmail.com) Received: from [193.19.192.5] (HELO mail.evolva.ro) (193.19.192.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:52:37 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.evolva.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B076FDC0A for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:19:59 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail.evolva.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (evonet.ro [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21925-01-4 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:19:57 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.62.51] (unknown [86.55.40.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.evolva.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7F46FDC04 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:19:57 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <43512BC6.6090907@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:18:14 +0200 From: Alexandru Popescu User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: bdb-persistence & db-persistence in contrib References: <90a8d1c00510140618md84e6e6ubde81f25516566f7@mail.gmail.com> <20051014141546.93D2A10FB2A5@asf.osuosl.org> <90a8d1c00510140744q31377d2p28121cd14e441a80@mail.gmail.com> <434FC63F.8080903@ingen.at> <90a8d1c00510140814s5ab1ca41p2fa18e42a07ade7b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <90a8d1c00510140814s5ab1ca41p2fa18e42a07ade7b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at evonet.ro X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N #: Stefan Guggisberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 10/14/2005 5:14 PM :# > hi walter > > On 10/14/05, Walter Raboch wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am currently developing a database PM based on Hibernate 3 and a >> "fully" normalized DB schema (also for binaries). I will post my >> experiences as soon as I have a fully working system - which I estimate >> within the next week. > > cool, looking forward hearing back from you. > > just being curious: why did you choose an object-relational db instead > of a plain relational db? who mentioned object-relational db? Hibernate works against RDBMS so it is pure relational. The benefits of working with a ORM solution were discussed many times, and the pros and cons were presented. Sure, someone may choose to do it with pure JDBC, iBatis mappings or whatever solution he may like ;-). couldn't resist it, ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. representing jackrabbit's primitive ItemState objects > in a normalized sql schema should be straightforward. what's the benefit of > the object-relational mapping? > > cheers > stefan > >> >> cheers >> Walter >> >> >