jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcel Reutegger <marcel.reuteg...@gmx.net>
Subject Re: was [performance (again)] -> concurrent access?
Date Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:33:31 GMT
David Nuescheler wrote:
>>random access : 453 ms
>>search by property: 453 ms
> can you describe what you mean by "random access"? is that accessing
> a node by path or by uuid? or something different.
> is it just coincidence that search by property takes exactly the same
> amount of time as the "random" access?
> if you say "search by property" how many entries do you have in
> your search result?
> i would say that 453 ms would be too slow for a search with few results
> and is certainly way too slow for a single access of an item by
> path or uuid.

the first query may be slower because caches have to be populated, 
subsequent queries will be much faster. If I remember correctly the test 
only executes one single query.


View raw message