jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: bdb-persistence & db-persistence in contrib
Date Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:18:14 GMT
#: Stefan Guggisberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying on  10/14/2005 5:14 PM :#
> hi walter
> On 10/14/05, Walter Raboch <wraboch@ingen.at> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I am currently developing a database PM based on Hibernate 3 and a
>> "fully" normalized DB schema (also for binaries). I will post my
>> experiences as soon as I have a fully working system - which I estimate
>> within the next week.
> cool, looking forward hearing back from you.
> just being curious: why did you choose an object-relational db instead
> of a plain relational db? 

who mentioned object-relational db? Hibernate works against RDBMS so it is pure relational.
The benefits of working with a ORM solution were discussed many times, and the pros and cons
presented. Sure, someone may choose to do it with pure JDBC, iBatis mappings or whatever solution
may like ;-).

couldn't resist it,

.w( the_mindstorm )p.

representing jackrabbit's primitive ItemState objects
> in a normalized sql schema should be straightforward. what's the benefit of
> the object-relational mapping?
> cheers
> stefan
>> cheers
>> Walter

View raw message