Hi serge
Serge Huber wrote:
> I was away for 3 weeks at the army so sorry for the late reply.
>
It's probably my non native english skills betraying me but I'm curious,
is it some kind of expression or are you fighting a war in your spare
time? ;)
> The RMI-cluster solution is interesting, but I worry about
> connection/disconnection problems. The full database implementation
> causes performance problems, especially for binary data. Basically what
> this means is that we are implementing some sort of clustered
> file-system, that supports transactions and is as high-performance as
> possible.
I didn't mean jcr-rmi could be used to scale jackrabbit horizontally. I
meant that jcr-rmi could be used in a j2ee cluster scenario to access a
single instance of jackrabbit, I'm thinking of something like ...
Box1. App Server Box2. App Server2
jcr-rmi client jcr-rmi client
---------------- ---------------
\ /
\ /
----------------
BOX3. jackrabbit
jcr-rmi server
best regards,
edgar
>
> Regards,
> Serge Huber.
>
|