Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21526 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2005 19:07:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2005 19:07:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 75173 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2005 19:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75158 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2005 19:07:28 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:07:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [141.202.248.38] (HELO mail12.ca.com) (141.202.248.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:07:42 -0700 Received: from usilms28.ca.com ([141.202.201.28]) by mail12.ca.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:07:25 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6556.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5AD96.0E74B401" Subject: TCK tests Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:07:24 -0400 Message-ID: <5F266C8676DF1241BED644C210ABFD1901AA9142@usilms28.ca.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: TCK tests Thread-Index: AcWtlg3AhXxMK6+YTfOFSpLwidlOHw== From: "McComsey, Doug" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2005 19:07:25.0060 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E8ABC40:01C5AD96] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5AD96.0E74B401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm trying to pass the TCK tests with my own implementation. I am failing some (34) of the workspace move and copy functions with an ItemExistsException because I have only one workspace. =20 Section 4.10.1 of the spec describes "Single Workspace Repositories", so I assume I can have an implementation with only one workspace. What is the policy when the TCK is testing functions I don't support? Can I be "certified" as level two compliant with a one workspace implementation? =20 Regards, Doug =20 Doug McComsey Computer Associates doug.mccomsey@ca.com =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5AD96.0E74B401--