jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Myers" <qqmy...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: associations between nodes
Date Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:05:19 GMT
Prof Mazzochi sounds 'way off' ;-) ,

but thats how I've seen references - as the way to encode RDF. I forget how 
far we backed off in the final spec, but the idea of including a "following' 
clause in the query language was a way to let you query along graphs. I 
don't think there's as clean a way to deal with all of RDF (e.g. reification 
(statements about statements), anonymous nodes), but I think references 
could work reasonably well for general triples.


>From: David Nuescheler <david.nuescheler@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: david.nuescheler@day.com
>To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: associations between nodes
>Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:18:34 +0200
>hmmm... it sounds like if we could name relationships we are half way 
>would the property name for a reference property be a good way of doing
>that? if we were to bolt up the Node.getReferences() with a filter for a
>particular property name would that be sufficient?
>so something like:
>+- students [joe's-uuid, jack's-uuid]
>then this should allow for something like joe.getReferences("students") to
>return profmazzocchi...
>i may be way off here, but i am sure stefano will tell me ;)

View raw message