jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Guggisberg <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: jackrabbit deployment model 1
Date Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:28:42 GMT
On 7/14/05, Julien Viet <julien@jboss.org> wrote:
> If you disable the cache then you reload everything all the time and
> should achieve the desired effect, but performances will suffer a lot.
> 
> By the way I disabled the cache in jackrabbit (I simple modified the
> code to have the SharedItemCache have the put() do a noop).
> 
> Some tests were not passing with that change. I think it is not normal
> to have the tests failing when the cache is disabled (even if it
> is uses a hack to make it not effective)

what would you expect if you'd mess around at the very core of a 
repository/rdbms?

> 
> Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> 
> > Julien Viet wrote:
> >
> >> because jackrabbit uses an internal cache that you cannot disable.
> >
> >
> > and even if you would be able to disable the cache, one instance had
> > to tell the other one that something has changed on disc. otherwise
> > you would have to scan the filesystem all the time for possible changes.
> >
> > clustering is not that easy ;)
> >
> > regards
> >  marcel
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Julien Viet
> JBoss Portal Lead Developer
> 
>

Mime
View raw message