jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julien Viet <jul...@jboss.org>
Subject Re: jackrabbit deployment model 1
Date Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:52:40 GMT
If you disable the cache then you reload everything all the time and 
should achieve the desired effect, but performances will suffer a lot.

By the way I disabled the cache in jackrabbit (I simple modified the 
code to have the SharedItemCache have the put() do a noop).

Some tests were not passing with that change. I think it is not normal 
to have the tests failing when the cache is disabled (even if it
is uses a hack to make it not effective)

Marcel Reutegger wrote:

> Julien Viet wrote:
>> because jackrabbit uses an internal cache that you cannot disable.
> and even if you would be able to disable the cache, one instance had 
> to tell the other one that something has changed on disc. otherwise 
> you would have to scan the filesystem all the time for possible changes.
> clustering is not that easy ;)
> regards
>  marcel

Julien Viet
JBoss Portal Lead Developer

View raw message