Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66726 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2005 14:57:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2005 14:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 36842 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2005 14:57:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36827 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2005 14:57:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of edgarpoce@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.200 as permitted sender) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:57:15 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so403706nzo for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:56:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jOFzvv7eS02SqLcLCturOyUSf/lRwCIbQcakdAVOlIKA1vz2jGDkeJpR0qJpeR9rdqwg6m/HLAXLK8eTdRiNpw0oF/GL1JSAb2htH/ZRhWzOemnth36ptHjPbTJ20QQO7DtRB5lL+FSaumR0krFlQ+6D7BfxZm6ErlTrhlWms1U= Received: by 10.36.222.74 with SMTP id u74mr438754nzg; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:56:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.65.12 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a83c96b050610075671140779@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:56:53 -0300 From: Edgar Poce Reply-To: Edgar Poce To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: ORM-based persistence contrib build problems In-Reply-To: <42A9A601.8020709@jahia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <634FDB4B15BE1048973D26E8D03F317802900F07@EX-101.mail.navisite.com> <42A51AEE.9090303@gmail.com> <42A6FCB8.6040708@jahia.com> <42A7181C.3080902@jahia.com> <42A7803A.6020105@gmail.com> <42A80BDA.8010505@jahia.com> <8a83c96b05060907332852bfc7@mail.gmail.com> <42A962E0.8020408@jahia.com> <8a83c96b05061005542d1a6b44@mail.gmail.com> <42A9A601.8020709@jahia.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 6/10/05, Serge Huber wrote: > On another point : am I right assuming that there is one instance of a > PM for every workspace, or did I understand it wrong ? AFAIK you are right. >=20 > I noticed that in your JDBC implementation you chose to map workspaces > to databases. What do you think is better between that and using an > extra workspace column ? I still had no time to make the changes, but I'll use a single db for al the workspaces. If each workspace is mapped to a db, on workspace creation the PM should create a new db. >=20 > Regards, > Serge Huber. >