Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31265 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2005 14:23:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2005 14:23:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 492 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2005 14:23:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 478 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2005 14:23:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 07:23:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [213.185.42.161] (HELO grotti.greywolves.org) (213.185.42.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 07:23:16 -0700 Received: (qmail 10882 invoked by uid 103); 30 Jun 2005 14:23:09 -0000 Received: from ip213-185-42-165.laajakaista.mtv3.fi (HELO [213.185.42.165]) (213.185.42.165) by grotti.greywolves.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:22:47 +0300 Message-ID: <42C4002D.9050505@zitting.name> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:22:37 +0300 From: Jukka Zitting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Jackrabbit versioning & releases References: <42C3D6D1.2080408@zitting.name> <42C3EC93.9060205@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <42C3EC93.9060205@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, OK, I just created the unreleased 1.0 version in Jira, please feel free to use it to tag any issues you think should be included in the 1.0 release. What is the general feeling about making a release? What features that are still missing should be included? How soon the release should be made? What types of documentation would be needed? Best practices to follow for release engineering? I browsed through the open issues in Jira and scheduled some of them for the 1.0 release. I also added some new wishes. Please feel free to disagree with this proposed scheduling. BR, Jukka Zitting