Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of gazarenkov@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.192 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:from;
        b=fIcjLgZd9Y5yWzCFVffw+NwYK+RhnsZmyfZiicQx9pI68ooxYFqSqGakVhFn0yh51COdyhMwhpR4QHxpRHLhcSLvyslNPl4WaWx7js21U6C98q7IrePpa7BkrIVvrhkJHw2HnxEtYJzCPh9ztvi5aoqfxaaLZ7UjMwoq18O/dtc=
Message-ID: <021401c5700e$6bb1bab0$f273020a@Gennady>
To: <jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org>,
	<david.nuescheler@day.com>
References: <42A9B4D4.1050806@anyware-tech.com>
 <eb7e21905061104482c6d0cb4@mail.gmail.com>
 <42AAFEC4.4080508@anyware-tech.com>
 <8be731880506121151400825fe@mail.gmail.com>
 <020501c56fed$f4781590$f273020a@Gennady>
 <eb7e219050613035367b7dce0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Getting VersionHistory after removing of a Node
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:52:42 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gennady Azarenkov <gazarenkov@gmail.com>

hi david,

yes, i get it, that was rather mine misunderstanding :)

thank you,
gena

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Nuescheler" <david.nuescheler@gmail.com>
To: <jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: <tobias.strasser@day.com>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: Getting VersionHistory after removing of a Node


hi gennady,

> IMHO it is good behaviour if there is only one versionable node belonging 
> to
> that VH
> but i am not sure if it is correct to remove all versionable nodes (in all
> workspaces)
> belonging to that VH (especially if versionable nodes from different
> workspaces
> have base versions belong to different branches)?
> i think we can not to change version history until there are at least one
> node connected to it
> and remove the version history along with the last versionable connected 
> to
> it as you suggest.
the way i read tobi's suggestion it was not to remove any versionable
node whatsoever.
i think it was that based on the fact that the versionhistory
is empty and has no reference (eg. versionable node) pointing
to that particular vh, to "garbage collect" that version history.

or am i misreading something?

regards,
david