jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Guggisberg <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JackRabbit as Shared J2EE Resource
Date Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:05:31 GMT
On 6/10/05, Jukka Zitting <jukka@zitting.name> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Florian Ried wrote:
> >    <!-- Global Repository -->
> >    <Resource name="jcr/globalRepository"
> >          auth="Container"
> >          type="javax.jcr.Repository"
> >
> > factory="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepositoryFactory"
> >          configFilePath="D:\repotest/repository.xml"
> >          repHomeDir="D:\repotest"/>
> 
> I checked through the BindableRepositoryFactory source code [1] and
> noticed that it doesn't instantiate the repository unless the resource
> type is set to "org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepository" (see
> line 60). Thus the instructions on the web are incorrect in proposing to
> use "javax.jcr.Repository".
> 
> Try changing your global configuration to:
> 
>      <Resource name="jcr/globalRepository"
>            auth="Container"
>            type="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepository"
> 
> factory="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepositoryFactory"
>            configFilePath="D:\repotest/repository.xml"
>            repHomeDir="D:\repotest"/>
> 
> Is there a good reason for requiring the exact class instead of the more
> generic interface in the JNDI configuration? 

i am not a jndi expert and i remember looking at sample code when i 
implemented jndi support ;) you can probably change it to accept 
a reference to the Repository interface.

cheers
stefan



> I'll submit a bug report to track this issue.
> 
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/jackrabbit/xref/org/apache/jackrabbit/core/jndi/BindableRepositoryFactory.html#51
> 
> BR,
> 
> Jukka Zitting
>

Mime
View raw message