jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gre...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Workflow
Date Sun, 05 Jun 2005 15:53:20 GMT
Miro Walker wrote:

> I haven't fully thought this through yet, but I think the idea of
> nodetypes to define workflows and workflowsteps would be a good start as
> a way to define workflow templates. That definition would define the
> state transition information between workflowsteps. However, it may be
> necessary to separately model an instance of a workflow template for a
> specific target, and a mixin that simply points from nodes to
> workflowsteps as a many to one relationship might not be sufficient for
> all applications. 

would that be one of the situations where jackrabbit could document 
commonly used node types? i remember a discussion about that a while ago.

Mime
View raw message