Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
From: "Peter Morton" <Peter.Morton@gtnet.com>
To: <jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org>, <tobias.strasser@day.com>
Subject: RE: Start Up Time
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 09:40:40 +0100
Message-ID: <NDEKKGMOBGFOCNFHNLKAOEHJGIAA.Peter.Morton@gtnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <8be7318805052701217e0f79d2@mail.gmail.com>
Importance: Normal

If the versioning initialisation performance is a known issue that requires
attention, has anyone had any thoughts on how to improve this?

I have noticed the poor performance when adding several thousand nodes to
version control and was wanting to come to a quick solution.  At the moment
we are running the repository on NTFS (which I know does help things) but
after moving to linux and ext3 the performance didn't really improve so I am
assuming there is something needing to be greatly optimized in the code
above at the PM level.

I will be looking into this in more detail next week, but any pointers would
be welcome.

Thanks,

Peter.

--
Peter Morton
Graham Technology plc,
http://www.gtnet.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tobias Strasser [mailto:tobias.strasser@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 May 2005 09:21
> To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org; david.nuescheler@day.com
> Subject: Re: Start Up Time
>
>
> you are correct, currently the versioning initializes the set of
> histories, but this will be optimized. afaik, the query index does
> scale very well with an increasing number of items. we could add some
> timing info for the startup.
>
> cheers, tobi
>
> On 5/27/05, David Nuescheler <david.nuescheler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > hi simon,
> >
> > On 5/20/05, Simon Gash <Simon.Gash@gossinteractive.com> wrote:
> > > Anyone know why JackRabbit is taking longer to start the more
> content I
> > > add. I always presumed that it only loads items from the PM
> as required,
> > > or am I missing something...
> > i experienced the same thing, as far as i remember it was something
> > to do with versioning or the query index, but i am not sure anymore.
> >
> > i think you are right, there is no sensible justification for
> that behaviour
> > and should probably be categorized as an issue.
> >
> > regards,
> > david
> >
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------< tobias.strasser@day.com >---
> Tobias Strasser, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001 Basel
> T +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97
> -----------------------------------------------< http://www.day.com >---
>


________________________________________________________________________________
This email (and any attachments) is private and confidential, and is intended
solely for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error
please remove it and inform us via telephone or email.

Although we take all possible steps to ensure mail and attachments are free
from malicious content, malware and viruses, we cannot accept any responsibility
whatsoever for any changes to content outwith our administrative bounds.

The views represented within this mail are solely the view of the
author and do not reflect the views of Graham Technology as a whole.
________________________________________________________________________________

Graham Technology plc                               http://www.gtnet.com
________________________________________________________________________________