jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Nuescheler <david.nuesche...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: webdav suggestion
Date Wed, 18 May 2005 08:24:42 GMT
i think i understand angela's concerns, and i think those are
healthy design decisions, however from my perspective it 
would be great if as many contributions were jackrabbit independent 
and only relying on the jsr-170 api. 

i think this is one of the very important reasons when
a repository vendor decides to become jsr-170 compliant 
that they do no longer have to build all these "commodities" 
themselves from a webdav-server to an eclipse plugin, 
to an rmi-layer etc...

so while i agree that code duplication is not desirable, i would
(until the situation with the helper classes is resolved) suggest
to anyway duplicate the code to maintain the independence from
jackrabbit. i think we currently have a similar situation with the
Values for the rmi-layer (and others).

i also would like to second stefano's comment: "patches welcome!"


View raw message