jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcel Reutegger <marcel.reuteg...@gmx.net>
Subject Re: Performance issues of using "object" repository rather than "orm"
Date Wed, 18 May 2005 13:00:55 GMT
Philippe Girolami wrote:
>>Object PM
>>con:
>>- non-transactional
> 
> meaning XA or is the Object PM not even atomic when using
> versionning/locking ?

If jackrabbit with an Object PM crashes while it is storing nodes, only 
parts of the nodes might get written. those nodes will still be visible 
when jackrabbit is started up again, even though the transaction has not 
been completed. I guess fixing this would make a nice patch or 
contribution ;)

using a database backed PM with such a scenario, the database would 
simply rollback the unfinished transaction.

regards
  marcel

Mime
View raw message