Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16183 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2005 22:23:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2005 22:23:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 86391 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2005 22:23:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86375 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2005 22:23:56 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of david.nuescheler@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.193 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:23:56 -0700 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so1066528rne for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:23:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MekPPUtfbtnRreLyPa6u1dB5ldpB0vUbZSY6Uyzq3yQ6SOSuVohkgq6bKBgxLIz4Nwymzbd6+JPOT548hs+TV12FvBYVF6RJRj2KC4Bxs0P2AFIX/wUoGqbDBsw4hPY0IoFkzhLyxoPjjPfhcM0pYbvPOEQ4nKxTp8jTOBDK+PI= Received: by 10.38.1.71 with SMTP id 71mr1659097rna; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.11.73 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:23:54 +0200 From: David Nuescheler Reply-To: david.nuescheler@day.com To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org, Daniel Dekany Subject: Re: Getting "custom" objects from the repository? In-Reply-To: <17610321258.20050417231935@freemail.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <181174235.20050416061620@freemail.hu> <1916674571.20050416201707@freemail.hu> <42617802.9090403@jboss.com> <1975422982.20050416232421@freemail.hu> <735421141.20050417195940@freemail.hu> <17610321258.20050417231935@freemail.hu> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N hi daniel, ... i think for the sake of avoiding redundancy and saving everybody's time, i will not comment on the rest of your=20 post, however i feel like i have to give credit where=20 credit is due.=20 > I don't mean last modification time for all nodes,=20 > just a mixin type...=20 now, that idea i like. i think this could be implemented nicely into jackrabbit. actually, i think roys mention of=20 the "etag" offers an even more interesting perspective,=20 but the rep:lastModified-mixin sounds like a valuable=20 extension to jackrabbit. > BTW, JSR 170-0.16.3 question: Why is the jcr:lastModified of nt:resource > is ignored from versioning? i agree again, i also think it should be COPY ;) thanks. regards, david