Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of michael.wechner@wyona.com
 designates 195.226.6.68 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <424F1C38.9000901@wyona.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:27:04 +0200
From: Michael Wechner <michael.wechner@wyona.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: cluster and cache question
References: <424D75AC.2040806@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <424D75AC.2040806@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Edgar Poce wrote:

> Hi
>
> I'm trying to use jackrabbit in a cluster scenario. Since jdbc calls 
> are rather expensive caching results is a common practice, but as you 
> all pointed PMs are not designed to be smart. So, do you think caching 
> should be in the PM?, it should be somewhere else?, it shouldn't be at 
> all? any more option?


I am no expert in clustering and would rather like to learn myself how
to do this, but I guess re caching it's important that the cache
or parts of if can get flushed if something is changing. I really
don't have enough understanding, but wouldn't it be best to provide/attach
such a cache directly within Jackrabbit itself?

Thanks

Michi

-- 
Michael Wechner
Wyona Inc.  -   Open Source Content Management   -   Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com                      http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner@wyona.com                        michi@apache.org