jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edgar Poce <edgarp...@gmail.com>
Subject cluster and cache question
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:24:12 GMT

I'm trying to use jackrabbit in a cluster scenario. Since jdbc calls are 
rather expensive caching results is a common practice, but as you all 
pointed PMs are not designed to be smart. So, do you think caching 
should be in the PM?, it should be somewhere else?, it shouldn't be at 
all? any more option?

I'm thinking of a cluster scenario with
jdbc PM + distributed cache + jackrabbit
instead of
any PM + jackrabbit + rmi server + rmi client

I prefer the first config because there are products that build the 
cache on each server and don't pass the cached objects around the cluster.

  It seems I often feel tempted to bad practices :(, so I'd like to know 
your opinion before taking a decision.

thanks in advance

View raw message