Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of david.nuescheler@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.170.197 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=LqL56WAUaiWvwjlS0vlamhbJof6hHSyVJEDAt9VbkYCpoV0wzW7kvMIB2nNZRzLNdRWBh/uRiu0P0/aWcpoJHhV78UIDJScC2KNijgFeNqZgy424SlOTDJkgHO0WSZMlGXBlxQgPzTyquVIChbbn5n/jmjsbx2wVAHwUcUTT19s=
Message-ID: <eb7e2190503171019407e7fb8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:19:39 +0100
From: David Nuescheler <david.nuescheler@gmail.com>
Reply-To: david.nuescheler@day.com
To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mapping Layer needed?
In-Reply-To: <4239BBD8.7@inovex.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <4236DABE.3060403@capgemini.fr> <4236E542.4060702@inovex.de>
	 <4239BBD8.7@inovex.de>

hi sandro,

thanks for your post, i think it is a very interesting topic.

as a matter of fact i discussed things like a hibernate or
jdo layer on top of jcr with a couple of people, and if=20
i haven't completely misread your first post may be=20
a similar proposition.

i personally (of course ;)) believe that a repository may offer
a very good persistence layer for things like POJO's in=20
particular  with respect to features like inheritance, which=20
particularly for RDBMSes are unnatural to handle.

thoughts??

regards,
david


On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:18:16 +0100, Sandro B=F6hme <s.boehme@inovex.de> wro=
te:
> Hello again,
>=20
> as there is no feedback - do I miss something? Would'nt it be best
> practice to map the business logic java bean classes to node types?
> E.g. an OrderBean with the property orderItem would map to an
> "Order"-NodeType with a ChildNodeDef "OrderItem". Assuming the
> "OrderItem"-NodeType (or it's ChildNodeDef's) has all needed atomic
> properties (PropertyDef's).
> In my opinion, creating an initial node type hierarchy out of java beans
> shouldn't be that hard as a first step. Of course, keeping the mapping
> during remove or rename tasks for node types would be harder. I just
> don't want to start working on it, if anybody of you already know that I
> missed something and it makes no sense in this way.
> Thank you in advance for your time.
>=20
> Best regards,
>=20
> Sandro
>=20
> Sandro B=F6hme wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > in our project I would like to generate the JCR nodetype structure out
> > of a java bean class structure. If I'am right I think it is needed quit=
e
> > often and I wonder if there is already such a library around. Does
> > anybody know of such a library? If not, I would try to create a first
> > version of it.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Sandro
> >
> >
>=20
>=20


--=20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
standardize your content-repository !
                               http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=3D170
---------------------------------------< david.nuescheler@day.com >---

This message is a private communication. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it
to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying
to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you.

The sender does not assume any liability for timely, trouble free,
complete, virus free, secure, error free or uninterrupted arrival of
this e-mail. For verification please request a hard copy version.


mailto:david.nuescheler@day.com
http://www.day.com

David Nuescheler
Chief Technology Officer
Day Software AG
Barfuesserplatz 6 / Postfach
4001 Basel
Switzerland

T  41 61 226 98 98
F  41 61 226 98 97