Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <42405BF3.6080508@jahia.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:54:59 +0100
From: Serge Huber <shuber2@jahia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Patch for ORM persistence project
References: <423B0F4E.10703@gmail.com> <423B1343.9030809@gmail.com>
 <423B1A69.4000108@day.com> <424026DF.6000602@jahia.com>
 <42405548.6050607@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <42405548.6050607@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


A follow-up : I suggest though that we both still stick to running all 
the tests against both ORM persistence managers. Running all the tests 
is an important guarantee of quality for these implementations, and I'd 
like to make sure we are "as good as" the default persistence managers 
(over time of course), provided we have the required time to "catch up" :)

Regards,
  Serge ...

Edgar Poce wrote:

> Hi serge
>
> I'm making major changes in the OJB PM in order to improve 
> performance. I'm trying to remove all the ORM specific objects.
> OJB uses transparent persistence: Persistent classes don't have to 
> inherit from a persistent base class or to implement an interface, so 
> I'm using the OJB features to persist the jackrabbit objects directly 
> to the database. Instead of ORM objects I'm using OJB specific 
> features like RowReader and FieldConversion. I think this improvement 
> would tackle most of the "unnecesary complexity issue".
>
> So, you can focus on the hibernate while I work on OJB, WDYT?.
>
> regards
> edgar
>