Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of edgarpoce@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.197 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=WGIJUc49RbrC+96BhIQqOiVUTdyKGlef+i6l7PYKS7umbTGzZdsyRAYdYfRKOqMFKKXyGv9hBqC8gppOkietnKbB2egAbS49GdhebSc9NhhYCq8wgia7nyq6o8DVKOkxyvCzkTLNxmQmEPgKk+12FSHv9W5v9hgUApOdkXoQsnE=
Message-ID: <42385EB9.1030201@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:28:41 -0300
From: Edgar Poce <edgarpoce@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adivce about session
References: <423858FB.4030106@capgemini.fr>
In-Reply-To: <423858FB.4030106@capgemini.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi

Bertrand LEGA wrote:
> I would be glad to hear your thoughts about using the jcr session in a 
> J2EE web application.
> 
> Basically, there are two solutions :
> 
> 1. create a session to the jcr each time a page access to the 
> repository. It is basically what's the jcr tags propose to do :

>   The session is destroyed when the processing of the jsp page is done. 
>   2. Create a jcr session when the HttpSession is created and use it 
> during the user session (ie the jcr session stored in the httpsession). 
> This jcr session is destroyed when the HttpSession will be (using a 
> HttpSessionListener for example).

Both approaches are supported in the jcr taglib.

the example 2 would be

in a SessionListener:
session.setAttribute("mySessionKey",mySession)

in jsp:
    <jcr:nodes node="/" var="node" traverserDepth="1" 
session="mySessionKey">
       <c:out value="${node.path}"/>
    </jcr:nodes>

> 
> Personnally, I would prefer the solution 2.
me too

> What do you think about it ?
> Do you know if tests had been carried with a important number of 
> concurrent sessions (100-1000) ?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Bertrand.
> 

regards
edgar

> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential 
> and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the 
> person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,  
> you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,  
> distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive 
> this  message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 
> all  copies of this message.
> 
>