jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Guggisberg <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] log4j to commons-logging conversion
Date Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:26:57 GMT
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:24:43 +0200, Jukka Zitting <jz@yukatan.fi> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> [Stirring up the religious subject a bit more...]
> 
> A recent thread [1] on the Jetty mailing list discussed the logging
> issue and ended favoring the UGLI approach over commons-logging. Of
> course the logging requirements of Jetty differ from those of
> Jackrabbit, but many of the raised points still apply.
> 
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jetty.general/5438
> 
> Based on the discussion and Ceki's reasoning, I'm inclined to think that
> UGLI might be a good choice for Jackrabbit.
> 
> However, as log4j 1.3 (that has built-in support for UGLI) is still in
> alpha and as there is no immediate pressure for logging API independency
> (few existing Jackrabbit-based apps), I'd propose putting the issue on
> hold until log4j 1.3 is released.

+1

thanks
stefan

> 
> BR,
> 
> Jukka Zitting
> 
>

Mime
View raw message