jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Serge Huber <shub...@jahia.com>
Subject Re: Patch for ORM persistence project
Date Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:51:36 GMT

Sounds good to me, I dreaded to have to constantly test on OJB and 
Hibernate. The original design goal of my persistence layer was to avoid 
making it specific to a mapper, but if we both take care of one it seems 
like it's less of an issue.


Edgar Poce wrote:

> Hi serge
> I'm making major changes in the OJB PM in order to improve 
> performance. I'm trying to remove all the ORM specific objects.
> OJB uses transparent persistence: Persistent classes don't have to 
> inherit from a persistent base class or to implement an interface, so 
> I'm using the OJB features to persist the jackrabbit objects directly 
> to the database. Instead of ORM objects I'm using OJB specific 
> features like RowReader and FieldConversion. I think this improvement 
> would tackle most of the "unnecesary complexity issue".
> So, you can focus on the hibernate while I work on OJB, WDYT?.
> regards
> edgar

View raw message