jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Serge Huber <shub...@jahia.com>
Subject Re: PersitenceManager and Filesystem summary
Date Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:21:08 GMT

Well you could also simply package a HSQL database, maybe even already 
populated and you would have nothing to configure.

But of course for demo purposes it's less critical.

Regards,
  Serge Huber.

Edgar Poce wrote:

> Hi stefan
>
> I said "not so easy" because they are not out of the box solutions. 
> You need to configure the database, get the drivers, and some more 
> stuff..
>
> Maybe it's not so important in enterprise decisions, but when 
> distributing a product for evaluation I think it's a major issue. e.g. 
> the Lenya distribution. I think that, even the slow performance issue, 
> the LocalFileSystem is the best choice for the lenya distribution.
>
> regards
> edgar
>
> Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
>
>> i agree with everything that edgar said,
>> with 2 minor comments:
>>
>>
>>> - b-tree persistence manager
>>> . no drawbacks?
>>> . I guess it will be hard to configure.
>>
>>
>>
>> not necessarily, i don't see why it should be harder to configure
>> than e.g. the ObjectPersistenceManager.
>>
>>
>>> - straight JDBCPersistenceManager.
>>> . best option for rdbm
>>> . not so easy to configure
>>
>>
>>
>> not necessarily, depends on the rdbms you're using.
>>
>> cheers
>> stefan
>>
>>
>>> regards
>>> edgar
>>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message