From jackrabbit-dev-return-638-apmail-incubator-jackrabbit-dev-archive=www.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Sun Feb 06 21:31:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50564 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2005 21:31:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2005 21:31:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 52133 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2005 21:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52120 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2005 21:31:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of david.nuescheler@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.197 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:31:08 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so717722rna for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:31:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Ly/G8xWjAgG6FQt0aXFLQ+gMtiqATpfTBBOXGB696bC3rcDmY87yBJWH9U3M4/VANMm3TPopUksEVSdjuEMYgl+YO6FuA2LcFWVzg5uVpPvENmCw8R2pqXa+r7joWkSVRjQogKNJOvmuqflfI3/viGlalqMdEUuPXB8Ee3U1yiM= Received: by 10.38.160.51 with SMTP id i51mr229926rne; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:31:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.86.70 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:31:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 22:31:06 +0100 From: David Nuescheler Reply-To: david.nuescheler@day.com To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Never Mind - Solved it myself Re: Introduction followed by Dumb, Obvious Developer Question Cc: "Glenn R. Golden" , Mark Norton In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N hi chuck, > I upgraded to the latest maven 1.0.2, whacked my maven repo, re-checked out > JCR and voila - happy little unit tests run successfully. > I will save my first dumb obvious question for later. cool, looking forward to further discussions or comments from your end. > > > > Hello to the JackRabbit community. My name is Charles Severance, the Chief > > Architect of the Sakai project - www.sakaiproject.org - > > collab.sakaiproject.org has a sample system up and running. > > > > I am kicking the tires on Jackrabbit for possible adoption as the core of our > > storage within Sakai (An open source collaboration and learning management > > system). If we were to jump in here with Jackrabbit, we would probably > > write/improve/contribute an open source high performance implementation to > > scale to 100000 users at a single site (yikes). We are already well underway > > to building a fast, scalable, hierarchical authorizaion system using > > Hibernate. > > > > I have 2-3 developers to dedicate to this effort for the next six months if we > > adopt Jackrabbit because our alternative is to write this ourselves from > > scratch with our own API. > > sounds great. i would assume that your users would mostly read from the repository? jackrabbit should be well suited for that. do you have any expectations with respect to how much content you are going to store in the repository? or how frequently content is written to the repository? with respect to the hierarchical authorization, i would certainly be interested to find out if the "soon-to-come" built-in native jackrabbit authorization is going to suit your needs, both functionality and performance-wise. regards, david